home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 94 00:58:39 PDT
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: List
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #1138
- To: Info-Hams
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Fri, 21 Oct 94 Volume 94 : Issue 1138
-
- Today's Topics:
- 22 OCT - Durham NC - NRE Commercial Radio Op Exam
- 824-851 MHz??
- ARRL to change "Silent Keys" label in QST? (2 msgs)
- Callsigns.
- Code Programs/Sound Blasters
- Commercial test pool?
- CW Learning: Going slow. :(
- Earth Ground (was: ARRL And Gay Hams S
- Earth Ground (was: ARRL And Gay Hams Settle Complaint)
- Give me your Definition of Ham Radio!!!
- Intl call sign servers/CDs
- List radio publications FREE on the Web
- opinion:Icom IC-W21A
- Who to complain to?
- Yaesu 757 + GXII ? (2 msgs)
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 20:40:19 GMT
- From: ab4el@cybernetics.net (Stephen Modena)
- Subject: 22 OCT - Durham NC - NRE Commercial Radio Op Exam
-
- Commercial Radio Operator License Examinations:
-
- Durham, NC - - 22 October 94 - - 9:30 a.m.
- SW Branch of Durham Public Library: 3605 Shannon Road
-
- Steve Modena AB4EL (919) 787-7618
- or Terry Murphy AB4VJ (919) 494-2088
-
- How To Get There:
-
- Talk-in: we will listen for this Durham repeater: 144.85/145.45
-
- These instructions work if you approach South Square Mall
- via 15-501 BYPASS.
-
- You are in the vicinity of South Square when you can see the
- lone skyscraper with the "needle" tower.
-
- Whether you are coming from I-40, headed north on 15-501 BYPASS...
- or coming from I-85, headed south on 15-501 BYPASS, there will be
- a sign indicating "Keep Left for 15-501 BUSINESS -- South Square."
-
- Exiting from either direction of 15-501 BYPASS leads to the same spot.
-
- Passing under an overpass, there is a traffic light at a cross road
- named "Westgate"...and the Lone Star restaurant is ahead at 2 o'clock.
-
- Go straight ahead.
-
- Midway to the next traffic light, there is a sign: "Next right to
- Auto Drive." At the light, there is a big Circuit City store is on
- the left...and the only turn possible is to the right, onto Shannon Road.
-
- Turn right at this light.
-
- The first traffic light on Shannon Rd. is at Auto Drive and
- you are in the midst of South Square mall: continue straight ahead.
-
- The next traffic light on Shannon Rd. is the 3900 block of
- University Drive: go straight ahead.
-
- After passing the Shannon Manor apartment complex, the next intersection
- has a stop sign and is called "MLK Jr.": go straight ahead.
-
- Heading up a small hill and reaching the crest just before the curve,
- you are looking straight at the Durham Library--Southwest Branch...
- a brick building set on the left side of and below the level of the road.
-
- The exam site address is 3605 Shannon Road.
-
- The exam room is visible through a very large window to the right of
- the building entrance. Commercial Radio Operator License Examinations
-
- Durham, NC - - 22 October 94 - - 9:30 a.m.
- SW Branch of Durham Public Library: 3605 Shannon Road
-
- Walk-ins are welcome, but seating is limited.
- For more info or to reserve an exam seat, contact:
- Steve Modena (919) 787-7618
- or Terry Murphy (919) 494-2088
-
- Licenses Attainable:
-
- Marine Radio Operator Permit - - Element 1
- General Radiotelephone Operator - - Elements 1 & 3
- GMDSS Radio Maintainer - - Elements 1, 3 & 9
- GMDSS Radio Operator - - Elements 1 & 7
- Ship Radar Endorsement - - Element 8
- 3rd Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate--Elements 1, 5, T1 & T2
- 2nd Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate--Elements 1, 5, 6, T1 & T2
- 1st Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate--Elements 1, 5, 6, T3 & T4
-
- Who is offering it: W5YI-affiliated NATIONAL RADIO EXAMINERS in N.C.
-
- What will be offered: Examinations on elements 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
- Contact us before hand about Code Elements--credit for elements T1 & T2
- is granted to Amateur Extra Class License holders who passed their
- 20 WPM test.
-
- What to bring:
- Two forms of positive personal ID
- Your extended ZIP code: xxxxx-XXXX
- CASH for the examination fee
- Personal check or credit card for FCC fees (if any)
- Hand calculator (optional)
- Code credit via Extra Class License requires showing original license
- and a copy of it
- Radiotelegraph license application requires two (2) photos--call us
- about requirements
- Good preparation and a relaxed mind
-
- WARNING: Anything that even resembles cheating or an attempt to cheat
- will be reported *directly* to the FCC, as per regulations
-
- How We Operate:
-
- 1. Any or all of the currently offered written elements available may
- be taken.
-
- 2. Elements may be taken in any order
-
- 3. The amount of time allowed for the examination session will be
- reasonable, but not unlimited.
-
- 4. We reserve the unequivocal right to limit seating:
- first come, first served!
-
- 5. If you fail an element, there will no opportunity to retry that
- element during the same session.
-
- 6. Each element passed sucessfully will be recorded on a
- Proof-of-Passing Certificate.
-
- 7. If you qualify for a license, you may prepare an FCC Form 756,
- or defer until a later time.
-
- 8. We will file the license application for you, or you may opt to
- file for yourself.
-
- 9. We recognise Proof-of-Passing Certificates from other W5YI groups
- and from other authorized testing organizations. However, we
- will file for a license on your behalf only if at least one of
- your needed PPCs was obtained during the current examination
- session.
-
- 10. Fees charged for the examinations themselves, payable in cash,
- follow this NRE rule:
-
- "At this time, NRE requires a fixed $35 fee from each candidate
- for the administration of any and all examination elements
- required for each commercial license per sitting. If any
- elements are failed, no license which required the failed
- element would be issued and the applicant would have to
- schedule another exam session and pay another fee to obtain
- the desired license."
-
- 11. Certain licenses are subject to a FCC Regulatory Fee:
-
- Marine Radio Operator Permit: $35.00 (5 year term)
- General Radio Operator License: no fee (lifetime)
- GMDSS Operator (alone): $35.00 (5 year term)
- GMDSS Mainainer (alone): $35.00 (5 year term)
- GMDSS Operator/Maintainer (issued as combo): $35.00 (5 year term)
- Ship Radar Endorsement: no fee (5 year term)
- 3rd Class Radiotelegraph: $35.00 (5 year term)
- 2nd Class Radiotelegraph: $35.00 (5 year term)
- 1st Class Radiotelegraph: $35.00 (5 year term)
-
- 12. There are two options for paying any required FCC Regulatory Fee:
- a. Peronal or bank check or money order, payable to the
- "Federal Communications Commission"
- b. Completion of a FCC Remittance Advice-FCC Form 159 for
- payment by credit card.
-
- 13. We are absolutely obligated to be certain that you are who you say
- you are--and not a "ringer" standing in for you. Make sure that
- the identification that you present will pass muster--otherwise
- you will not be allowed to sit for an examination. If you have
- any doubt about what will be a suitable combination of ID documents,
- feel free to telephone us and discuss it.
-
- * * Latest Status on Radiotelegraph Code Examination * *
-
- As per telephone conversation with NRE-W5YI on Friday 07 October 1994,
- the software for generating the required format and content style is
- not ready. The FCC is yet to issue the guidelines...the messages
- (presumably the clear text exams) are to be similar to messages
- encountered in the service. If the timeliness of taking a code
- examination is of critical interest to you, call and alert us of your
- need so that we can contact you about any change in this situation.
-
- --
- de Steve Modena NRE Test Center Manager ab4el@Cybernetics.NET
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 21 Oct 1994 02:26:20 GMT
- From: dbarton@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu ( )
- Subject: 824-851 MHz??
-
- Just out of curiosity, what is located in the 824-851 MHz range? I
- notice that most scanners do not cover this range. My guess is TV, but I
- am willing to be proved wrong. Thanks in advance...
-
- Doug
- --
- "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The
- strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and
- bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against
- tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson
-
- "Sometimes, I guess, there just aren't enough rocks."
- - Forrest Gump
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 20:09:00 +0000
- From: Mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk (Mike Gathergood)
- Subject: ARRL to change "Silent Keys" label in QST?
-
- Hi Michael,
-
- > Clearly, we need some "Truth in Advertising". These hams can't be
- > silent "keys", because most of them were probably too lazy to touch
- > a key (or even know what a key is, for that matter...).
-
- What a terribly insensitive attitude. Never speak ill of the dead.
-
- > -- Ted Kennedy has killed more people with his car
- > -- than I have with my gun.
-
- Did you see his new bumper sticker?: 'My other car is underwater'
-
- 73
- Mike
- G4KFK - 25wpm on a good day!
-
- *************************************************************************
- * The CQ Centre BBS * 01753 595468 and 01753 593524 * Fidonet 2:252/320 *
- * Hundreds of Megabytes of Quality Software for Radio Amateurs and SWLs *
- * Tel 01753 582085 * Fax 01753 592726 * Internet mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk *
- *************************************************************************
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 23:09:10 -0500
- From: Leland Van Koten <leevankoten@delphi.com>
- Subject: ARRL to change "Silent Keys" label in QST?
-
- Michael P. Deignan <md@pstc3.pstc.brown.edu> writes:
-
- >Therefore, I think its incumbent upon the ARRL to split the "Silent
- >Keys" column into two sections: a "Silent Keys", for real hams that
- >know what a key really is, and a "Silent PTTs" section, for the 2 meter
- >good-buddy box users.
-
- Do you include among the "real hams" the 2 guys with calls indicating they
- have been around since before anybody even THOUGHT of "no-code technicians" who
- deliberately tuned up on top of me and then started their QSO on their
- "private" frequency when I had a good run going on 75 meters during the recent
- Pa. QSO Although I was only using 100 watts, I know they heard me,
- since they were commenting about "Is there a contest going on? Yeah, there
- seems to be a lot of QRM -- I had to turn my amp. all the way up to get rid
- of it" -- or words to that effect. I also know that I put a pretty good
- signal into their area with my 100 watts.
-
- The irony is that if they had politely asked me to move, I would have done it
- since while I like participating in contests, I'm far from serious about it and
- will always take time out for a ragchew, getting out of the way of a net, you
- name it. I'm not criticizing people who don't, but it never even occurred to
- these idiots to even ask -- much less to look for another frequency (and there
- were others around).
-
- There are lids among the no-code techs., but they sure don't have a monopoly on
- them. In fact, given what I hear on the air and the numbers of people with
- the various license classes, I wonder if there may not be more lids per capita
- among Extras than any other class. I doubt it, but it wouldn't shock me if it
- were true.
-
- Lee, KE3FB in Md.
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 06:02:26 GMT
- From: linley@netcom.com (Bruce James Robert Linley)
- Subject: Callsigns.
-
- Even the number in the callsign is becoming meaningless. Here in CA I
- know a couple of N2XXX and KB4XXX hams. Soon, I'll be moving to 7-land
- (NV or AZ), but I don't want to give up my callsign.
-
- --
- Bruce James Robert Linley =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Amateur Radio: KE6EQZ
- linley@netcom.com <--- Left Brain =-=-=-=-= Right Brain ---> linley1@aol.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 15:39:11 -0400
- From: ke2ag@aol.com (KE2AG)
- Subject: Code Programs/Sound Blasters
-
- In article <199410200859.BAA04216@ucsd.edu>,
- t.wright@msuacad.morehead-st.EDU (Tim Wright KD4OVM) writes:
-
- Look for "SBPMORSE.ZIP" at just about any FTP site that has ham radio in
- it.
- I got my copy from America On Line.
-
- KE2AG - "dave"
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 22:33:53 GMT
- From: Ken.Tiernan@lambada.oit.unc.edu (Kenneth R. Tiernan)
- Subject: Commercial test pool?
-
- Are there any ftp sites that have the commercial radio test pools or study
- guides?
- KEN N5PKA
- --
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- Launchpad is an experimental internet BBS. The views of its users do not
- necessarily represent those of UNC-Chapel Hill, OIT, or the SysOps.
- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 21:53:25 -0500
- From: Leland Van Koten <leevankoten@delphi.com>
- Subject: CW Learning: Going slow. :(
-
- Steven M. Palm <smp@agape.sol.net> writes:
-
- >MY PROBLEM: I can't receive worth the darn. :( Actually, I just have
- >a real hard time hearing the sound and connecting in my brain to the
- >actual character, yet sending goes like a snap.
- >
- >Is this a common "hurdle" to overcome, or am I just odd. :) (Thankfully
- >no one here knows me well enough to add much to that one... :) I am
- >using the SuperMorse program (EXCELLENT!) to learn, and am wondering
- >if the code tapes may have been a better route, and this is a side-
- >effect of my choice in learning.
-
- Steven -- I learned with tapes, and used SuperMorse to practice after I had
- the basics down pretty pat, but you can certainly do it the opposite way --
- whatever works for you!
-
- One nice thing about tapes is you can use them where you can't use SuperMorse,
- such as in the car on a commute.
-
- One thing that worked for me, and that I know has worked for some other people
- is sounding out the code for EVERYTHING you see -- out loud if you're by
- yourself or with someone who understands such lunacy, in your head if you're
- where someone might think you've totally flipped out. This is really
- practicing sending more than receiving, so it's no substitute for the tapes,
- but it gets you "thinking in CW" for as many hours per day as possible, which
- can really speed the process up.
-
- I did this with street signs, names of objects, you name it. License plates
- are especially good if you're in a state where they use combinations of several
- letters and numbers rather than mostly numbers, since they tend to use the rare
- letters that aren't used that much. And I really did it with EVERYTHING when
- I wasn't in a situation where it was imperative that I concentrate on something
- else. I'd see a tree: "Dah Di-dah-dit Dit Dit;" a Chevy: "Dah-di-dah-dit
- Di-di-di-dit Dit Di-di-di-dah Dah-di-dah-dah."
-
- It may not work for everybody, but it did for me.
-
- The other big piece of advice is to try to join class where you're exchanging
- feedback with other people. Everybody hits plateaus where they don't feel
- they're making any progress. I tried to learn CW a couple of times several
- years before I finally did it, and thought I "couldn't learn CW" when I hit a
- plateau where it felt that I wasn't making progress and might even be
- regressing.
- What I didn't know until I took a class is that this happens to everyone, and
- the periods that you learn the fastest seem to follow immediately upon these
- periods where you're not picking up anything. It's almost like when a computer
- says "working" or some such -- like your brain CAN'T learn any more until it
- process what you've already learned. Some people say to stop when you hit one
- of these periods so you don't become discouraged. My personal reaction is that
- doing that makes it too easy to quit altogether -- just know that what's
- happening is entirely normal.
-
- Good luck and congrats on the decision to upgrade.
-
- 73 de Lee, KE3FB in Md.
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 20:14:18 +0000
- From: Mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk (Mike Gathergood)
- Subject: Earth Ground (was: ARRL And Gay Hams S
-
- Hi Bob,
-
- > The thread of this discussion is a social issue and is away from the topics
- > of amateur radio. How about moving this discussion to another news group?
- >
- > Thank you, in advance,
- >
- > Bob
- > KE6GTI
-
- Precisely - so why do LARC feel they have the right (or the need) to bring
- our hobby into disrepute in order that a few of their members can come out
- of their sordid closets. It is LARC that is off topic!
-
- 73
- Mike
- G4KFK
-
- Straight - and proud!
-
- *************************************************************************
- * The CQ Centre BBS * 01753 595468 and 01753 593524 * Fidonet 2:252/320 *
- * Hundreds of Megabytes of Quality Software for Radio Amateurs and SWLs *
- * Tel 01753 582085 * Fax 01753 592726 * Internet mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk *
- *************************************************************************
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 13:57:50 -0500
- From: dave@flowserver.stem.com (David Adams)
- Subject: Earth Ground (was: ARRL And Gay Hams Settle Complaint)
-
- Please take the gay/anti-gay crap elsewhere. This is a RADIO
- newsgroup.
-
- 73 de dave
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 94 00:37:35 GMT
- From: kevin@sparc.SanDiegoCA.ncr.com (Kevin Sanders)
- Subject: Give me your Definition of Ham Radio!!!
-
- In article <4480DXDOCTXSMANQPU@mcube.com> unique@mcube.com writes:
- >
- >In our household there are three lincensed hams myself kd6lbn and 2 yls
- >kd6lzo and kd6kpj. Our definition of hamradio is as follows.
- >
- [ unreadable stuff deleted ]
-
- Perhaps people aren't as helpful as you'd like because it's far too much
- effort for them to understand you. I apologize to the net if I'm talking
- to a robot or something...
-
- --
- Kevin Sanders | Voice: (619) 485-3972
- AT&T Global Information Solutions | FAX: (619) 485-XXXX
- 17095 Via Del Campo | Email: kevin@sparc.SanDiegoCA.ncr.com
- San Diego, CA 92127 |
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 20:22:50 GMT
- From: smithson@ACM.ORG
- Subject: Intl call sign servers/CDs
-
- I have a list of callsign servers and an Amsoft CDROM but they only
- have FCC/American calls. Does anyone know of a server or CD CD that has
- international calls as well?
-
- 73!
-
- -Brian n8wrl
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 1994 04:47:59 GMT
- From: sapphire@world.std.com (Michael R Prolman)
- Subject: List radio publications FREE on the Web
-
- You can list two nonprofit publications about radios
- for FREE in UNCAT, the catalog of uncataloged titles.
-
- UNCAT has titles from businesses, nonprofit groups, trade
- associations, museums and self-published authors with
- research reports, pamphlets, brochures, catalogs, newsletters,
- booklets, books, videocassettes and audio cassettes.
-
- You can explore UNCAT at this case-sensitive URL:
-
- http://www.sapphire.com/UNCAT/
-
- If you have any difficulty connecting, an alternate URL is:
-
- http://www.digimark.net/UNCAT/
-
- Check out the Hello Direct, Inc. catalog in the Products
- subject area to see the full scope of UNCAT.
-
- If you are new to the Web, try typing:
-
- Lynx http://www.sapphire.com/UNCAT/
-
- or
-
- Lynx http://www.digimark.net/UNCAT/
-
-
- If you want detailed information about UNCAT, or have only
- e-mail access to the Internet, send e-mail to:
-
- info-UNCAT@Sapphire.com
-
- *****************
- Michael R. Prolman
- President
- Sapphire Press
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 21:20:51 GMT
- From: edmitch@microsoft.com (Ed Mitchell)
- Subject: opinion:Icom IC-W21A
-
- Regarding the IC W21A versus other radios. A year ago I bought the W2A,
- the logical successor to ICOM's IC24AT dual band handheld. I am pleased
- with the W2A.
-
- When shopping I considered the W21A. The "whisper" mode feature that enables
- you to use the radio more like a phone (held to your ear, with the microphone
- in the battery pack) looked very handy to me. In checking around, the only
- major complaint I heard was that the maximum audio level output was too
- low because of the very small speaker that was used. Some didn't like the
- microphone built-in to the battery packs since batteries do where out after
- around 125-150 deep discharge/recharge cycles and the mic adds to the expense
- of the battery replacement. But overall, the reviews I read were generally
- positive of the W21.
-
- I ended up buying the W2A because my wife has a IC24AT it helped having identical
- battery packs that we can swap. FYI the external mic connector on the 24AT and
- the W2A are NOT the same so you can't use the same external mics.
-
- Ed Mitchell
- KF7VY
- edmitch@aol.com (personal)
- edmitch@microsoft.com (work)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 22:12:36 -0500
- From: Leland Van Koten <leevankoten@delphi.com>
- Subject: Who to complain to?
-
- Carl Draus <cdraus@ix.netcom.com> writes:
-
- >Could anyone here tell me who I could call to have something done about my inconsiderate
- >CB slob neighbor. He is constantly stomping on my TV reception, bleeding all over my phone,
- >and you can even hear the jerk on my clock radio when it's not even turned on. I've asked him
- >nicely a number of times to tone it down. He knows exactly what he is doing to my houshold and
- >apparently doesn't give a damn. He swears he is legal, but the last I was aware of, a CB should
- >not be able to reach from North Carolina to Barbados, Arkansas, or Mexico. Is there someone
- >out there that can do something about this for me?
-
- Carl -- It's possible he is only operating with legal power, but I seriously
- doubt it. Technically, talking to Barbados, Arkansas and Mexico is illegal on
- CB, but those rules are rarely enforced (and, IMHO, shouldn't be if the
- operator is otherwise legal), and it is certainly POSSIBLE to talk those
- distances using 5 watts or less. It's also POSSIBLE to cause interference
- with properly adjusted equipment operating at legal CB power, but a lot of
- CBers cause problems by not paying much attention to their equipment except
- for seeing that it operates at the maximum possible (not maximum legal) power.
-
- Look in the phone book to see whether there is a listing for the Federal
- Communications Commission. If there is, call and explain the problem. They
- don't have the staff to jump on this type of situation as rapidly as one that
- is affecting public safety, for example, but they DO enforce the rules when
- they are able to do so.
-
- It's also possible, however, that he is operating at legal power and is only
- transmitting on the proper frequencies. A lot of electronic equipment these
- days is absolute junk as far as shielding from radio frequency interference.
- My next-door neighbor pointed out to me that when I operated on the 7 MHz band
- I was getting into one of his two stereo speakers even when it was off. I
- didn't think it was possible, but darned if he wasn't right! I checked my
- equipment, and it was all operating correctly, so the problem was obviously in
- his equipment. Fortunately, that's the only band that was a problem, I operate
- on it relatively infrequently, and we're good friends, so there's not a
- -- but it does demonstrate that these problems can occur even when the
- transmitter is operating properly and legally.
-
- Lee, KE3FB in Md.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 20:37:47 GMT
- From: ham@wam.umd.edu (Scott Richard Rosenfeld)
- Subject: Yaesu 757 + GXII ?
-
- >After looking at a 757GXII that was for sale, and looking at back issues of
- >QST for review articles, can anyone tell me why the 757 was re-released as
- >the GXII? Was it to fix some kind of bug? Its production run didn't last
- >very long, did it?
- >
- >My coverage of QST is limited, only back to '86, and I wasn't able to find an
- >article on it in any of the end-of-year directories; the adverts don't
- >show many GXII's. Wasn't able to find a review of the 757, either.
-
- OK, here we go. After having one of each to sell, here are the differences:
-
- The '757 came out in 1984. Wildly popular, with very small size, general
- coverage receiver, AM/FM/SSB/CW and a 600-Hz filter standard, AND an iambic
- keyer standard! It could be controlled via computer and an interface box.
-
- There were some complaints about it, though. The tuning rate was slow, and
- there was no "FAST" mode. It had IF shift and IF width, plus an infinite
- clarifier (RIT) and a Noise Blanker. But it was missing a notch filter.
- The mode didn't get stored in the memory as it was set via a mechanical
- switch.
-
- The GX/II came about around 1989. Same "guts" as the 757GX, else they would
- have renamed it. There was now:
-
- 1) A "FAST" button, to achieve a faster tuning rate
- 2) A "MODE" button which cycled the radio through a series of LED's indicating
- the mode. The mode was now stored in memory along with the frequency.
- 3) A Notch Filter. Wow.
-
- The scanning feature was somehow changed, although I don't remember the
- specifics. Well, that's about it. The case color was changed slightly,
- and the fluorescent display, once a purplish-blue (very pretty and
- colorful), was replaced with a gray-blue display (quite drab in comparison).
-
- The radios have the same receiver and transmitter circuitry, save for your
- standard running changes. The interfaces and bells & whistles changed.
-
-
- --
- 73, _________ _________ The
- \ / Long Original
- Scott Rosenfeld Amateur Radio NF3I Burtonsville, MD | Live $5.00
- WAC-CW/SSB WAS DXCC - 130 QSLed on dipoles __________| Dipoles! Antenna!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 20 Oct 1994 14:07:35 -0500
- From: randster@bga.com (James R. Shields)
- Subject: Yaesu 757 + GXII ?
-
- After looking at a 757GXII that was for sale, and looking at back issues of
- QST for review articles, can anyone tell me why the 757 was re-released as
- the GXII? Was it to fix some kind of bug? Its production run didn't last
- very long, did it?
-
- It looks and acts like a great radio to have, as far as used equipment goes,
- but are there problems to be encountered down-the-road?
-
- My coverage of QST is limited, only back to '86, and I wasn't able to find an
- article on it in any of the end-of-year directories; the adverts don't
- show many GXII's. Wasn't able to find a review of the 757, either.
-
- Is this a good used radio to buy? Opinions/comments welcomed! Tnx. 73.
-
- randster@bga.com
-
- randy
- kj5vb
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 20:15:27 +0000
- From: Mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk (Mike Gathergood)
-
- References<Cxt1FJ.Kpo@news.Hawaii.Edu> <782498115snz@g4kfk.demon.co.uk>, <3827bs$aqq@eram.esi.com.au>
- Reply-To: Mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk
- Subject: Re: Earth Ground (was: ARRL And Gay Hams Settle Complaint)
-
- Hi Dave,
-
- > | BTW, are there really as many as 2%? It's about time we brought back
- > | flogging!
- >
- > Better get those whips ready then. Looks like Amateurs are just as
- > intolerant as the rest of society; I was hoping for something better.
-
- Glad I'm normal :-)
-
- *************************************************************************
- * The CQ Centre BBS * 01753 595468 and 01753 593524 * Fidonet 2:252/320 *
- * Hundreds of Megabytes of Quality Software for Radio Amateurs and SWLs *
- * Tel 01753 582085 * Fax 01753 592726 * Internet mike@g4kfk.demon.co.uk *
- *************************************************************************
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 94 22:34:42 -0500
- From: Leland Van Koten <leevankoten@delphi.com>
-
- References<CxFrpD.Kr6@umassd.edu> <1994Oct10.075613.7018@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>, <kevin.jessup.20.00937B25@mail.mei.com>
- Subject: Re: Cancer rate among hams. Was: WTB: Radar gun
-
- Kevin Jessup <kevin.jessup@mail.mei.com> writes:
-
- >>: NOW AS FAR AS CANCER GOES.... TALK TO ANY SEASONED HAM! even 73cm is
- >>: harmfull with handhelds! if 440Mhz causes cancer imagin what a flip
- >>: phone does at 820Mhz!
- >
-
-
- >>All we have is rumor, and some very uncontrolled studies. I don't
- >>know of any Hams who have quit using handhelds because of a reputed
- >>cancer risk.
- >
- >I agree with the "very uncontrolled studies" comment. I've often wondered
- >about the validity of ANY cancer studies on amateur radio operators.
- >
- >What's our average age anyway? Older people usually DO have a higher
- >cancer rate compared to the average population.
-
- I agree. In fact, given the number of guys I know in their 80's who are still
- active hams, it seems to me that an argument could be made that RF exposure
- PREVENTS cancer and other diseases of aging -- it's not a scientific sample,
- but I suspect it's as "scientific" as anything that supposedly "proves" the
- opposite proposition. I mean, how many males make it significantly past 80
- in the general population?
-
-
- >I've also noticed a sedentary lifestyle for the majority of the amateur
- >population around here. Much easier to "sit in the shack" (say that three
- >times real fast ;-) doing DX year after year rather than keeping the old
- >cardiovascular system in shape. If we DO get out of the shack, it's for
- >coffee and donuts! ;-) There is field day of course. That once-a-year
- >exercise. While I've only been invloved for about 2-years now, I've
- >experienced the decrease in physical activity myself.
-
- Not only a sedentary lifestyle -- excess caloric intake is a PROVEN cause of
- cancer in virtually every animal species studied, and as I look around my radio
- club (including in the mirror) it seems to me that could be a confounding
- variable in any study of cancer in hams.
-
- I can "prove" that, at least for people in Maryland, oyster consumption causes
- the skin to lighten, and crab consumption causes it to darken. (Oysters are
- traditionally eaten in months beginning with "R" and crabs are largely eaten
- in the non-oyster months.) There's certainly no question that there's an
- extremely high correlation between the consumption of these two types of
- seafood and skin darkness, but I doubt that many people would think that there
- was a causal relationship! Yet there's about as much evidence of one as there
- is that the terrifying technological innovation of the moment causes cancer.
-
- There should be some way to implant on the brain of every reporter who does
- one of these stories the statement: "CORRELATION DOES NOT PROVE CAUSATION."
-
- Lee, KE3FB in Md.
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #1138
- ******************************
-